我们知道在托福考试当中，综合写作一直是同学们比较头痛的一个问题，因为它不仅包含了写作，也包含了听力当中的内容，所以其实是对大家的英语能力，包括听和写的能力的综合性的考验。

　　今天老师就带大家一起来分析一下同学们在托福综合写作的常见问题，你中了几个？这些问题我们应该如何避免？

　　The lecture mainly talked about the ancient Europe connected with native Americans, North, by transporting silver coin to there, with some evidence, the lecture assumed that the history of connection with Native American was history fake. Nonetheless, the professor in the listening material voted against the content mentioned in the passage for several reasons and controversies.

First off, contrary to the content mentioned in the reading passage that the distance between Europe and America is too far away for traveling at that time, the professor demonstrated that the Norse, now in Canada, has the same site with the history records, which can explain the geological evidence for available traveling. Furthermore, ancient Europe loved to obtain objectives from all over the world, therefore, it is likely for them to reach the native America to attain things and bring back to Europe.

Moreover, to convince audience not to believe the context listed in the article that no other coins found beside those, the speaker in the listening record illustrated that it is necessary for Europe to go far away, which is also permanent. As we all know, silver coins are much valuable and could be considered as trading material. Thus, for the religion reason, Europes have appropriate reasons to take coins back to their homeland, and will not leave for Norse.　Finally, to further oppose the content in the lecture that there is even no use for Norse as European Coins, the spoken man in the listening lecture deemed that silver coins are actually very attractive and unusual for Norse, hence, they were willing to trade for those coins. For instance, neckless and other jewelries are so attractive for Norse, so they trade for them by using their local items. All in all, the professor in the listening material disagreed with all of the opinions mentioned by author for several reasons.

　　讲座主要讲的是古代欧洲与北美土著的联系，通过把银币运到那里，并结合一些证据，假设与美洲土著的联系史是假的。尽管如此，听力材料中的教授出于几个原因和争议投了反对票。

　　首先，与阅读文章中提到的欧洲和美洲之间的距离太远，不适合当时旅行的内容相反，教授证明了现在在加拿大的挪威人与历史记录有相同的地点，这可以解释可供旅行的地质证据。此外，古代欧洲喜欢从世界各地获取目标，因此，他们很有可能到达美洲本土去实现目标并带回欧洲。

　　此外，为了说服听众不要相信文章中所列的上下文，即在那些硬币旁边找不到其他硬币，演讲者在听力记录中说明，欧洲有必要走得更远，这也是永久性的。众所周知，银币非常珍贵，可以作为交易材料。因此，出于宗教原因，欧洲人有适当的理由把硬币带回自己的祖国，而不会去挪威。

　　最后，为了进一步反对讲座中的内容，甚至没有使用北欧货币作为欧洲货币，听讲座的人认为银币实际上对北欧人非常有吸引力和不寻常，因此他们愿意用这些硬币来交换。例如，无颈珠宝和其他珠宝对挪威人来说非常有吸引力，所以他们用当地的商品进行交易。总之，听力材料中的教授不同意作者提到的所有观点.